
Against Empathy
The Case for Rational Compassion
Failed to add items
Add to Cart failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
3 months free
Buy for $18.89
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
Karen Cass
-
By:
-
Paul Bloom
A controversial call to arms, Against Empathy argues that the natural impulse to share the feelings of others can lead to immoral choices in both public policy and in our intimate relationships with friends and family.
Most people, including many policy makers, activists, scientists, and philosophers, have encouraged us to be more empathetic - to feel the pain and pleasure of others. Yale researcher and author Paul Bloom argues that this is a mistake. Far from leading us to improve the lives of others, empathy is a capricious and irrational emotion that appeals to our narrow prejudices. It muddles our judgment and often leads to cruelty. We are at our best when we are smart enough not to rely on it and draw upon a more distanced compassion.
Based on groundbreaking scientific findings, Against Empathy makes the case that some of the worst decisions that individuals and nations make - who to give money to, when to go to war, how to respond to climate change, and who to put in prison - are too often motivated by honest yet misplaced emotions. With clear and witty prose, Bloom demonstrates how empathy distorts our judgment in every aspect of our lives, from philanthropy and charity to the justice system; from culture and education to foreign policy and war. Without empathy, Bloom insists, our decisions would be clearer, fairer, and ultimately more moral.
Bound to be controversial, Against Empathy shows us that when it comes to major policy decisions and the choices we make in our everyday lives, limiting our empathetic emotions is often the most compassionate choice we can make.
©2016 Paul Bloom (P)2016 HarperCollins PublishersListeners also enjoyed...




















People who viewed this also viewed...


















What did you love best about Against Empathy?
The concept is interesting and well cashed out with experimental results. Bloom provides good reasons to think empathy isn’t always useful (and is usually not useful).How would you have changed the story to make it more enjoyable?
Bloom is not a philosopher and his philosophical arguments are weak in many spots.Good Concept, Well, but not Rigorously, Executed
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Insightful, Helpful, and Fun
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Nothing You Haven't Considered
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
will make you reconsider your mental models
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Provocative, witty and persuasive
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
read and learn. dont revel in your ignorance.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Great perspective worth hearing
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Very accessible (almost no jargon) without having to water down the science
Not As Radical As It Sounds But Great Read
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
It would be even better if he did not accept political factions as an immutable given. After all, he is shaking their foundations.
His advocacy, and compelling examples, of rational thinking is heartening in the current climate of postmodern dominance.
Expose of ideological error, but not perfect
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
It's only too bad that it sounds like Siri is narrating it.
Great book, not so great narration
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.